The Optimism of the Heutagogs

The Brainery as Resource

Eighteen months ago, on World Heutagogy Day 2022, Vijaya Bhanu Kote launched her heutagogy Primary School the Heutagogy Brainery. This was 100 years after AS Neill launched his Summerhill school and, personally I think of Vijaya as a digitally-enabled 21st Century AS Neill. Not because she was inspired by Summerhill but, rather like Neill in A Dominies Log, she was informed by watching how her children learnt. Unlike Neill in his small quiet village in Scotland she found resources about Heutagogy and learning agency on the Web and, believing she had permission to develop a learner-centred approach to learning, she began developing her version of Heutagogy in her school, which ultimately culminated in the Brainery.

In recent discussions with Vijaya, her Heutagogs and their heutagogic parents I realised that another lens with which to view the Brainery by was our earlier Community Development Model of Learning. From research into existing digital community learning centres in 2002, we had discovered that effective community learning centres (in England) both evolved and improved in tandem with the human communities that they served. John Cook, who carried out this research, called this the lifecycles model of the learning centre, and he argued for a dynamic, responsive learning institution not a static, rigid, one trapped in the pedagogy of content-delivery.

This community-centred curriculum is another way of describing a human-centred approach to learning; arguably an Andragogy approach in that it comes out of negotiations with a community of people active in the learning centres activities. These are not only about learning but also represent a value, or need, of the community that the centre serves, in some specific way. John Cook described this as the hook; the attractor that made the centre inviting to the community that it was a part of. The attractor is a value in itself; it might be a creche, it might be a football team. The attractor then also shaped the evolution and development of the centre which would evolve in line with the interests of those people who attended and shaped the purpose of the centre and thereby its lifecycle.

Learning Architecture of Participation (AoP); to Nigel Ecclesfield and I this lifecycle model represents a learning AoP in which those attending and taking part in the learning offer are actually the subjects of the learning process, not the objects by which the institution measures and manages its performance. So the curriculum, or what people choose to learn in such a centre, evolves dynamically depending upon who turns up. Another aspect of the lifecycle model is that, almost like medieval guilds and their apprentice model, people who go evolve from having an erratic, occasional attendance just watching from the sidelines (or browsing the centres’ activities), to being part-time learners, then to full-time learners, to part-time assistants, to full-time assistants and, in some cases, employees. We called them trusted intermediaries; because they have earned the trust of those who attend due to their involvement with centre activities. Clearly at the Brainery and in her local community in Andhara Pradesh, Vijaya is highly trusted and significantly, in return, she trusts both her heutagogs and their parents in a wonderful virtuous circle of learning…

Continue reading “The Optimism of the Heutagogs”

Craft of Teaching (Algorithms)

The Craft of Teaching in the Age of Algorithms

Presentation online for Bucharest on 10/11/23. Full presentation first link, based on 13 Steps to a Craft of Teaching (in the Age of Algorithms) Individual resources listed thereafter (below) All resources derived from our book Digital Learning:

1. Trust the Learner

Everybody wants to learn

2. Trust the Teacher

10 Steps to a Craft of Teaching

3. The TEXTbook is an Algorithm

4. What is the Craft of Teaching?

5. What is a Craft of Learning (Learning is Emergent)

6. What is a Learning Architecture of Participation

7. Participatory Institutions Enable, Explore, Evaluate

8. What is Digital Practice? (Curiosity)

Digital Practitioner Research

9. Learning Psychotherapy (WikiQuals)

10 Fit for Context (Learning City 2.0)

11. Everything is a Metaphor

12. Romanian Model of Learning

13 You! Creativity in Teaching? The answer is you…

Creativity Workshop Resource

Links and resources to be added today

All resources derived from our book

Digital Learning:Architectures of Participation (Ecclesfield and Garnett)

Digital Learning in 7 Steps

Heutagogy Brainery

A New and Significant Launch for World Heutagogy Day 26th September 2022

Introduction; From her home in rural Andhra Pradesh, Vijaya Bhanu Kote, whose work has featured as part of World Heutagogy Day since 2014, has set up “The Heutagogy Brainery” to promote and support Heutagogic (self-determined learning) practice across the educational spectrum from early years to post-compulsory education. To support the launch, we are featuring Vijaya’s own introduction, below, to her work and the “Brainery, and the outline of her new book, which pulls together her work up to date. The “Brainery is an important development, drawing on over twenty years of engagement as a parent and teacher encouraging learner agency and self-determination, whose work has implications for learners and practitioners worldwide and is now recognised across India and around the world; Nigel Ecclesfield – September 2022

   Launch of Heutagogy Brainery World Heutagogy Day 2022; by Vijaya Bhanu Kote

Objectives of Heutagogy Brainery

  1. To create awareness about Heutagogy.
  2. To conduct awareness and self-realization courses for teachers, parents and students.
  3. To publish books on Heutagogy.
  4. To establish a research wing for Heutagogic research. 
  5. Counselling parents, teachers and students

It had been a long journey from 2006 to 2022 with Heutagogy. Heutagogy has changed my life as well as my family’s outlook about life and education. My son was about 18 months of age when I started experimenting on him. I wanted his brought up to be unique, with no pressure, no stress. I started experimenting on little things like letting him see me and imitate. Letting him do things on his own. For example, applying crayon colours on the pictures after watching me do it for few days, putting his toys in a carton after playing. Tidying up his workspace after playing or drawing, letting him do things on own, however he likes them to do, like selecting his own picture in the book or selecting his own toy. 

I read many books when he was in my womb. I used to talk to him placing my palm on my stomach. I read stories to him as well. May be, it was a compensative emotion to lessen my agony for the loss of my first two twin kids Glory and Gracy. He started doing things on his own after few months of imitation. He started growing up as a Heutagog. Some years later, he started school. He was self-determined in his choices and execution, but the schooling was quite different from his thoughts and expectations. My husband worked with the same institution where my son a pupil. Due to the frequent Asthma suffered by my child, we had the opportunity to make suggestions to his teachers. At our request, Buddy was not given any homework, nor put under any pressure to study as per the school norms or coerced to obtain grades in his work or exams. He was free. He practiced piano, played games, enjoyed being with his friends and family, learned new skills, read so many books, learned drawing and other skills., after his school hours. This gave him good insights and when he was in Grade III, we noticed a leadership spark and deft in writing in him. He collaborated with my school kids and established an organization named, “Impact” with the help of Green Climate Magazine team. He led many social awareness programs and, from then on, wrote stories and articles for magazines and painted many pictures. 

His success increased from then on leading him to talk about the National and the International issues in seminars and conferences, becoming a published writer and a social activist. He became a small farmer after watching the suicides of farmers in India. He wanted to understand how our agriculture can be transformed to ensure that farmers can live with dignity and sufficient wealth. He conducted many experiments in farming. He received State Eco Friend Award when he was in Grade VI (10-11 years). His school correspondent was so happy for him that he allotted land on his farm for Buddy to conduct his experiments. Buddy did experiments on mono cropping and mixed cropping and with the results he went to Ahmedabad to present his experiments at National Children’s Science Congress when he was in Grade IX. He gained the National KVR Scientific Society Award at the same time. His work won laurels from many organisations. During Covid 19, he read continually, listened to podcasts, did a Junior MBA course to find his further education course. He is now pursuing his education in Business Administration and wants to be a Social Entrepreneur. 

 When anyone asks him “What Heutagogy is about, he will just smile and say, “Liberty.”

When Buddy (Vardhishna Vibhavas Rajith Elipe) was growing up, being a Heutagog, my husband was overwhelmed with his son’s happy, easy-going, stress-free attitude. He started practicing Heutagogy for his school kids too. His teaching career took a new turn, and he was happier than before. He worked in a corporate school where experimentation was not so much encouraged. He took the permission of the school’s Joint Secretary and the principal to implement Heutagogic mode of learning. He had a hectic schedule, owing to which he could document not much of his work but was very much happy being a Heutagogy Practitioner. He submitted his experiments on “Introspective Heutagogy” for the World Heutagogy Day 2020 to wikiquals. He presented his paper on “Introspective Heutagogy” to CCE Finland Global Symposium in April 2022, that won laurels from the chair, UNESCO. 

I was diagnosed with Brain (pituitary)Tumour in 2021. My world toppled down as I was diagnosed with an exceedingly rare disease named “Cushing’s Disease” that was not identified earlier, though I suffered a great deal. The disease, along with its associated tumour existed in my body for at least 10 years without treatment. The rest was a story of search for a doctor who had proper skill in removing my tumour from an extremely critical area of my pituitary gland, my surgery, my walk towards recovery which is still going on. 

On the day of my surgery, only thing that pricked me hard was, “What will be the fate of the Heutagogic way of learning I have developed for Indian context?” I asked my husband and son to start a Heutagogy Academy and propagate Heutagogy. I asked them to encourage teachers, parents, and students to learn through Heutagogy and even urged them to establish a “Research Wing” that could encourage teachers, parents, and students to experiment and document their Localized Heutagogy.

    I survived the critical surgery but still on recovery mode with different health issues persisting and newly developing. My husband Bangarraju quit his job few months back and started working on the launch of “Heutagogy Academy.” I cannot be involved in the academy as I am working for the Government. So, both my husband and son got engaged with the works related to the academy. At last, on 26th September 2022, on the eve of World Heutagogy Day, we are launching “Heutagogy Brainery” at our place, may be the first of its kind in the world, as the founder of Heutagogy, Stewart Hase said. (There are so many agencies and academies in India that the auditors asked us for any other synonym for academy, so we gave the name Brainery)        

 We designed both awareness and self-realization courses for teachers, parents and students. We are planning to propagate Heutagogy around the world with these 5 principles;

  1. To create awareness about Heutagogy.
  2. To conduct awareness and self-realization courses for teachers, parents and students.
  3. To publish books on Heutagogy.
  4. To establish a research wing for Heutagogic research. 
  5. Counselling parents, teachers and students

Thanks, is a very small word but we would love to thank Stewart Hase ji, Fred Garnett ji and Nigel Ecclesfield ji for their constant support. Thank you so much for helping with editing and modelling my module that is being released on the World Heutagogy Day 2022. I would rather say, it is the soul talk of four souls. Thanks for everything. 

Vijaya Bhanu Kote 26th September 2022

More about World Heutagogy Day 2022 on The Heutagogic Archives

Levelling Up; Digital Learning

New Approaches to Place, Work and Education

Manchester 15/16 June 2022

Background; We, Nigel Ecclesfield and myself, Fred Garnett, have been working collaboratively in this area, that is attempting to develop a socially-inclusive approach to education, and society, through varying strategies connected education and society since we met at Becta in 2002.

Key Points; 1) Informal learning; in researching how people learn informally in newly developed digital community centres (2000-02) We developed the Community Development Model of Learning. Key message; we learn best from people they trust, not necessarily from educational professionals;

2) Emergent Learning Model; in looking at how we might integrate Informal (community) learning , non-formal (vocational) and formal (academic) learning (as part of the EU Bologna Process we argued that learning began in informal contexts and moved up into formal education institutions. Not the other way round as academic institutions continue to insist. Key message; learners learn long before academics assess and accredit their “education”

3) Social media models of learning; Having worked with the Learner-Generated Contexts Research Group, who were researching post Web2.0 models of learning, we helped develop the Open Context Model of Learning. Key message “learner-centred education after the internet requires teaching that is based on Pedagogy, Andragogyy & Heutagogy, in order to develop self-determined learners

4) I Am Curious #Digital in the emerging digital world we need to rely on teachers as Digital Practitioners using a combination of their professional curiosity, personal technologies to create “artfully-crafted, student-centred. learning experiences” Key message Education can be set up so that the digital curiosity of both teacher and learners can help co-create new student-centred learning

5) We can use the city as a learning environment. As we learnt in the Manchester-based Ambient Learning City project with Manchester University if we wish to change the frame of education, by changing the learning environment then the key message is that “Everything is a Metaphor” and we need to rethink the metaphors with which we understand learning”

6) Participatory Learning City 2.0 With the Silicon Valley hierarchical model of the smart city dominating how new technology use is viewed in cities we developed the Participatory City model and looked at what learning is in new contexts. Key message “Web 2.0 technologies change the use context and we need to  become active context-shapers” 

We’ve pulled all this work together in our new book Digital Learning: Architectures of Participation motto ‘Trust the optimism of the learners not the pessimism of the educators. Key message is that we need to be “building learning infrastructure

See also Nigel Ecclesfield on Architecture of Participation “Levelling Up Education

Further Education Inspiration

A Digital Learning Architecture of Participation

Our book is an attempt to rethink the future of education in the digital 21st century, based on a wide range of projects we have been involved in, with many other contributors working across several sectors of education and published in a number of peer-reviewed publications. Significantly for this post I want to highlight those aspects of our future-facing work that have emerged specifically from earlier innovative practice in UK Further Education.

The Open Context Model of Learning (2006); Our book opens with a discussion of our founding piece of work into digital learning which was developed collaboratively with 10 co-authors who had experience of digital projects and research across all sectors of the UK educational system. The Open Context Model of Learning was developed to be the “pedagogy” for an emerging learning practice where the learner used digital tools to access learning resources and designed their personal learning networks accessing social media using personal technologies as they co-created and determined their own learning goals (heutagogy). We (all) saw digital learning as representing a shift from a didactic, pedagogic subject-based education system, as it had been for 1000 years, to a collaborative, dynamic, open-ended process of inquiry, which will require a new digital learning infrastructure.

EMFFE (2007); This was the first project Nigel Ecclesfield and I worked on together and it was a national one designed to identify how to make Further Education institutions, colleges, more e-learning ready by creating an EMFFE (E-Maturity Framework for Further Education). Using the language of the book what we were concerned with was to examine how to design 21st century educational institutions in which digital learning would become the driver of educational outcomes. In partnership with 15 further education colleges from across England, representing the range of the sector, its educational practice and demographics, we created a sector-wide “e-maturity framework” and then gave each college some funding to do further developmental work across our 5 key areas; leadership, resources, technology, estates and human resources.

Architecture of Participation (2008) With our development work on the prototype of EMFFE completed (then handed to the Department of Education who passed it on to PWC for development into the Generator project) Nigel and I then wrote a paper for BJET in which we reflected on what we had learnt from the project and called it “Towards an organisational Architecture of Participation“. This was based on the O’Reilly term used in “What is Web 2.0?” (the participatory web) and was our first outline of how a digital learning infrastructure could be developed. We have continued to examine this question on the Architecture of Participation blog we describe an organisational Architecture of Participation as being “adaptive institutions working across collaborative networks” another way of describing 21st century digital institutions but also capturing how the EMFFE would work as sector-wide collaborative practice.

Digital Practitioner (2011); This is perhaps the most significant part of the book in terms of addressing how the process of digital transformation of traditional educational institutions might best be achieved. This was an open research project with original questions set by Geoff Rebbeck and a novel research process designed by Nigel where we interviewed 3 sets of FE lecturers on how they were using (any) technologies with their students. As we subtitled the research work it is about what happens when “digital natives grow up”, go to work and use the personal technologies that they grew up with in their professional work. Arguably it is about a digital “craft practice” where teachers develop their teaching expertise with technologies they are already comfortable with to create “artfully-crafted, student-centred, learning experiences

Curiosity and Critical Thinking (reflection); What was most interesting about the Digital Practitioner research for Nigel and I, who had come from working on large-scale national projects built at the institutional level, was that the emerging practice of the digital practitioner came from the everyday practice of Continue reading “Further Education Inspiration”

Digital Learning Literacy

Some Reflections

In 1997 I got to design an Internet Learning Lab at Lewisham College. I was the first person to write and obtain curriculum approval for a “blended learning” course (on “Information Systems in Society”) and I designed the layout of the lab around an “ecology of resources” model as Rose Luckin calls it, although I hadn’t read her work then. Computers, well PCs, were arrayed around the walls of the room and a large table dominated the centre, around which learners could discuss what they had discovered online. Search was still relatively primitive, full of Yet Another Hierarchical Officious Oracle (Yahoo) and probably the meta-search of Dogpile was the most useful. Google of course is NOT a search engine…

It occurred to me that we were about to do something entirely new in that class and I’d better rethink what the learning literacies would be when using online resources as opposed to books from a library. I already had a sophisticated, and unique, view of my teaching and learning strategies (as a colleague, Richard, said when adding me to his HNC course team in Systems Analysis “I don’t know what Fred does but his students love him“) which I called brokering; enabling students to learn by following their interests. So how could I help students follow their interests in this new online learning world? What would a learning literacy look like in the digital world? Well learning, not content-delivery (as in the severely-limited world of xMOOCs) came first, so I had to design afresh for this new learning context. However I was informed by 17 years of teaching experience which helped; a lot.

I decided to create a 3-part assessment for the course (which was examining the social impact of existing business information systems being used in new social contexts) as follows. Firstly a digital learning literacy portfolio (which was simply pass/fail as it was a form of training), secondly a research portfolio (evidencing the breadth and origin of resources used) and thirdly an individual project report on the social impact of an emerging technology

What I saw as a digital learning literacy was built around adjusting to what digital access offered whilst retaining the core qualities of how we might learn in a classroom. To my way of educating the classroom enables discussion; which is where “learning” takes place. So my digital learning literacy portfolio was as follows;

  1. Netiquette 
  2. Search
  3. Evaluation
  4. Supporting others learning
  5. Discussion
  6. Moderation

1 – Netiquette. The Internet, where “you own your own words” was arguably a far more ethical place than the (proprietary) web has become and there was a well detailed set of ethical principles called netiquette, largely developed for dealing with email conversations but also about respecting others online. I tried to emphasise this as a learning etiquette, where learning is co-created.

2 – Search is complicated or, as they say in Terry Gilliam’s film Brazil, “information retrieval is expensive” which was very much the case in 1997 when we were still in the post-Internet situation of needing to know the actual IP address of resources and so people were slowly building resources directories, which was how search was seen in 1997. Search meant 

Today we might say “Open the search doors Google” 

3 – Evaluation is about evaluating the value of the resources discovered through “search” so that they can be used for the research report being prepared by a student for their research assignment.

4 – Supporting others learning which is what we should be doing in classroom discussions, might be better described, perhaps, as supporting others research in this class. Each student was required to find a useful resource for at least one other student and give them the link to their resource. This usually lead to discussions about other students 

5 – Discussion is the essence of learning, as Socrates pointed out in the original Academy. In 1997 I used a free online discussion resource, egroups, and made that the focus of learning discussions, with behaviours shaped by the Netiquette agreement everybody had signed. Every learner had to both comment and lead discussions.

6 – Moderation which I though was actually the ultimate (new) digital learning literacy as it required learners to “lead” or chair learning discussions of their learning colleagues.

Still WIP

Fred Garnett 9/12/20

 

Digital Learning Architectures of Participation

A Book in 8 Questions and Answers

We have produced introductory set of slides covering our book from the perspective of 8 key questions. We think we offer many answers in the book but perhaps we haven’t formulated the right questions about the future of education and learning in a digital age. As William Gibson once said “the future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed“. We think that…

 “The answers are already here, we are just asking the wrong questions

Here’s our set of questions and answers about the digital learning future of education

The key questions we ask about the digital future of learning;

1.Can we make learning open? (Open Context Model of Learning)

2.Can we model learning? (learner-modelling)

3.Can we design for learning(Emergent Learning Model)

4.Can we use personal technologies (Digital Practitioner)

5.Can we design social structures for learning? (organisational Architectures of Participation)

6.Can we build digital institutions? (e-Maturity Framework for Further Education)

7.What does digital transformation look like? (Digital Transformation Projects)

8.Can we build a learning infrastructure? (Before and After Institutions)

Building a Learning Infrastructure…

Our 3 E view of an organisational learning infrastructure

All questions answered in outline in the slides and in detail fully in the book…

Digital Learning Architectures of Participation available from IGI GLobal

Fred Garnett FRSA 26th July 2020

The Optimism of the Learners

THE OPTIMISM OF THE LEARNERS
NOT
THE PESSIMISM OF THE EDUCATORS

Our book Digital Learning Architectures of Participation had its genesis when a group of British people who had built a prototype social network in 2002, a “Facebook” before Mark Zuckerberg had started coding ConnectU at Harvard for the Winklevoss twins, asked themselves the question “what would learning look like in a post Web 2.0 world?”

Having tried to build our digital future we recognised that we were moving into a Web 2.0 world and, as Hazel Henderson had said in 1984 “technology is the essence of politics” so the future of learning would be shaped by the emerging and evolving new technologies in the orbit of Web 2.0. In “What is Web 2.0?” O’Reilly had delineated some of the elements of Web 2.0, the participatory web, which has been described elsewhere as the Read/Write Web.
It would mean “web as a platform” it would mean “permanent beta” and it would mean building “architectures of participation” This book looks at these three core Web 2.0 ideas, and much more besides in terms of the broader aspects of a 21st century digital economy, and asks what it means for learning, and education if we wish to start educating 21st century citizens;
1. “Web as a platform” We interpret this as being about “learning beyond the classroom” and has been well-described in the “Ecology of Resources” model developed by Rose Luckin who sees the whole world as a learning resource in which people collaborate with “more able partners” to learn socially.
2. “Permanent Beta” We interpret as being about an evolving process of developing the education system as we learning more about learning. in our opinion this “emergent” process has been well described by Steven Johnson in his book Emergence. In line the Bologna Process, which looked to integrate “informal, non-formal and formal learning” we re-position the idea of permanent beta with our dynamic, adaptive, “Emergent Learning Model”
3. “Architecture of Participation” unlike “the institutional no” to digital change as Jeff Bezos describes it , we interpret organisational Architectures of Participation as being about the creation of “the institutional yes” to learning, and Education is really, really, really bad at that. We describe how an digital “e-maturity” model of networked organisational development can be used to create “adaptive organisations working over collaborative networks“.

Continue reading “The Optimism of the Learners”

Learning & Teaching in a Complex World

Romanian Business School Foundation 10th June 2020

We will be discussing this presentation  which has 5 themes, four of which are drawn from our forthcoming book “Digital Learning Architectures of Participation. This blog post is to allow comments and questions to be posted and answered here. The presentation is designed as a heuristic to promote ideas, and the themes are;

  1. The Craft of Teaching
  2. The Digital Practitioner
  3. Social Media Models of Learning
  4. The Romanian Way of Learning
  5. Building Learning Infrastructures

The Craft of Teaching; in a post Web 2.0 world with interactive digital tools everywhere and the ability to publish in any medium at any time we potentially existing in an Open Context world of Learning. How can teachers cope with this? By becoming “craft professionals” who understand the PAH Continuum by which they can enable “self-determined learning” and where the use;

  1.  P) pedagogic strategies to deliver subject content
  2. A) andragogic strategies to promote discussion and
  3. H) heutagogic strategies to enable self-managed and self-determined learning

The Digital Practitioner; researching the use of digital technologies by 1,000 lecturers in UK colleges we found that they had become digital practitioners who created “artfully-crafting, student centred, learning experiences” by

  1. Exploring with confidence and thinking divergently
  2. Trusting in a tapestry of technology, allowing students to play and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device)
  3. Curiosity lead them to use personal technologies in original ways and collaborate confidently with their colleagues sharing emerging best practice

Social Media Models of Learning; based on lessons learnt from the CROS and WikiQuals educational projects both designed after the rise of social media and incorporating them. Key ideas initially outlined by Violeta Serbu are;

  1. The Social Design of Learning (agreed by all participants)
  2. Learning Environment (design or choose; classroom, online, ambient etc)
  3. Tools (select and utilise)
  4. OR 1) Purpose 2) Context 3) Skills

The Romanian Way of Learning;  All learning is about reproducing the host culture. My time in CROS Camp in Plaui Foii taught me many things. With a history that goes back to the Cucuteni people and incorporates both Greek (Ovid in Tomis) and Roman history, Romania has many unique cultural aspects and traditions. For me 2 key aspects of Romanian learning are

  1. Peer-to-peer mentoring (Scaffolding learning as Vygotsky recommends)
  2. A natural blend of materialist and spiritualist thinking

If Romania is to “unboringify the boring” as Silvia Florea of Learnity recommends it needs to draw on and develop its own unique cultural character. Only Americans can be Americans so why bother copying them?

Building Learning Infrastructures; So far we have only had educational institutions designed to content delivery based on the primacy of text books with teachers being experts on courses using those textbooks. We have never built education around learning and we do not know what a learning infrastructure looks like. We think we need a “paradigm shift” from Educational Institutions to Learning Infrastructures. We argue for new learning institutions that are not based on business hierarchies but instead are based on the 3 E’s namely

  1. Infrastructures that are Enabling
  2. Teachers that are Evaluating
  3. Learners that are Exploring

Dont forget to check out my Bandwidth Romania discussing unique aspects of Romanian culture with Razvan Necula and Horea Murgu

Please post questions and comments below

Fred Garnett 10th June 2020

Learning versus Algorithms 

Learning in the Age of Algorithms

This is a contemporary chapter in our new book Digital Learning looking across the landscape of learning in the current, arguably, Age of Algorithms and of so-called Artificial Intelligence. We will particularly focus on issues raised in The Master Algorithm (Pedro Domingos 2015) around learning models and the future of learning.

We disagree on the definition of “learners” presented by Domingos;
learners are learners, not theories of learning.

We need to develop learner-centric NOT algorithms-based learning models in the 21st century. Domingos identifies 5 “scientific” theories of learning algorithms and presents them “dialectically” and so capable of improvement by the theorist (and by him alone).

In her Conversational Framework Professor Diana Laurillard presents 4 approaches to framing learning models, in order to stimulate thoughts about learning design, but offers them for reflection and adaptation. We prefer Laurillard’s process of modelling learners but believe that the 5th dimension of “Rhizomatic Learning” needs to be added to her framework in order to enable the learner to take the final decision on what has been learnt, and so produce a learner-centric framework to support learning design. Furthermore I would argue that we have already done this with our Emergent Learning Model, so I would argue that the answers are already here, we are just asking the wrong questions…

Our forthcoming book Digital Learning Architectures of Participation, which this blog is designed to support, will also work from ideas developed on the Learning in the Age of Anger blog, which look at a range of contemporary issues affecting the learning offer (such as the climate strike demand for a green curriculum). We are looking at what education in the 21st century might look like if we design learning based on;

the optimism of the learners
NOT
the pessimism of the educators

More on Digital Learning Architectures of Participation in Before and After Institutions

Full chapter now available in our book Digital Learning: Architectures of Participation

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑